NEWS:
Cassation 4498/15 of March 5, 2015: Can the bankruptcy of individual shareholders after the company transformation
The transformation of a partnership into a capital company shall not terminate the previous subject and creating a different entity and, therefore, in the persistence of the obligations contracted by the partnership and the subsequent declaration of bankruptcy of the company capital, the fully liable members of the partnership, unless accession to the transformation of the company of people of the creditors of the company, may be subject to failure.
Unless the creditor is then lent the consent for processing - very rare cases - will continue to meet the members of the company of people (in the case of the judgment, a snc) for past debts.
Protection of trademark and unfair competition: "Divani&Divani" against "Divini&Divani"
(Supreme Court 1861/2015 of February 2, 2015)
Even where the hallmark is categorized as "weak" (common words that distinguish the nature or quality of the product, as it is precisely "Divani & Divani"), the Court recognized greater protection in the event that the mark has however acquired distinctiveness in following a commercial intense and prolonged in time.
Such recognition does not compromise full protection in the event of infringement, even if achieved through simple formal variants such as to create a likelihood of confusion for the average consumer.
In the present case has been protected recognized brand "Divani & Divani" to the detriment of the other, clearly designed to mislead the consumer, "Divini & Divani"".
A secured credit, regardless of the aim pursued, is admitted to the privilege mortgage
(Court of Cassation, sez. VI Civil - 1, order no. 24038/14, filed November 12)
It is possible that the nature of the land tax credit is subject to the exclusive purpose acquisitive of a property, secured by mortgage guarantee necessarily of First Instance. Indeed, Article. 38 T.U.B. does not put these two elements as essential conditions for setting up a secured credit which, therefore, must be registered with the privileged status of the liabilities.
Is thus confirmed once again by the Supreme Court guidance now unanimous and that is the indifference of the economic destination of the sums received by way of land loan that can not be described as a "mutual purpose."
HARASSMENT VIA FACEBOOK LIKE THOSE ARE MADE "IN PUBLIC PLACE"
Criminal Appeal sect. I n. 37596/2014 filed September 12, 2014
The editors of a newspaper and the Facebook page of a user can be regarded as open to the public for the purpose of realization of the offense under Article. 660 č.p. (harassment or disturbance of persons).
The Supreme Court takes note of the social importance of "Facebook" and the relief that any defamatory postings in the social network may have.
The Court stated that "in fact, it seems undeniable that the social platform Facebook (available in over 70 languages, already in August 2008 had his first one hundred million active users, which is classified as the first social network service) represents a sort of virtual agora.
A "square immaterial" that allows an indeterminate number of "hits" and visions, made possible by a scientific evolution, which some lawmakers had not arrived to imagine "
As a result, the configurability of the criminal offense provisions of art. 660 č.p.
COUNTERFEIT CHEQUES Signatures from different stretch and uncertain: the Post had to be more careful
When the irregularity of the signature on a check post is visible and when in the holder's signature legitimate purpose and that there is such a discrepancy, for diversity of calligraphic, indecision in the stretch, and deletions of the same affixing wrong in space, is responsible for the entity for the payment of such allowances, because using the average diligence should have noticed ictu oculi alteration of the title.
(Court of Cassation, sez. Civil I, judgment no. 15145/14, filed on July 2)
http://www.dirittoegiustizia.it
LAWYER "ELECTRONIC": 30.06.2014 TODAY TO START THE PCT
With effect from 30.06.2014 apart from the cdPCT (electronic civil process), even with the slight changes from the DL n. 90 of June 24, 2014.
Starting today, despite the hopes of extending the majority of Italian lawyers, is enshrined in the mandatory electronic filing of many acts endoprocessuali for the "new" cases which will be hinged.
In reference to the ordinary courts art. 44 provides that
- the PCT is mandatory as from 30 June 2014 to the proceedings other than the application for an order "initiated" as of that date;
- is mandatory as from 31 December 2014 to the proceedings other than the application for an order already pending at 30 June 2014.
How the Courts of Apelles the d.l. n. 90/2014 adds art. 16-bis, d.l. n. 179/2012 a completely new paragraph (9-b) that, in relation to civil proceedings, provides for the electronic filing requirement for the acts of representatives of the parties previously established and technical advisers from the 30 June 2015 deadline may be early in individual courts of appeal and for specific categories of cases.
SEPARATION | June 11, 2014 Retention allowance paid by the husband-student helped by parents
The separation can not be charged to the husband who decides to embark on a long course of study during the marriage, or the wife who decides not to relocate with a spouse in the city, home to the new job. In addition, in the calculation of maintenance, shall be deemed to fall within the income spouse also in the economic contributions of parents, whether dished out regularly and continuously, and the possible increase in economic determined by a new job, even though the same has been obtained in Pending the separation process.
(Court of Cassation, sez. Civil VI-1, judgment no. 13026/14, filed on June 10)
http://www.dirittoegiustizia.it
GOOGLE: THE COURT EU: THE SEARCH ENGINE AND RESPONSIBLE FOR DATA PROCESSING: THE LINK SIDE MUST BE REMOVED (Source Ilsole24ore.com)
5/30/2014 The operator of a search engine on the internet is responsible for the processing of personal data carried out by it that appear on web pages published by third parties. So says the ruling of the EU Court number 131/12, released today, the so-called "right to be forgotten".
Thus, in the case where, as a result of a study carried out from a person's name, the list of results showing a link to a web page that contains information about the person in question, this may directly contact the manager or, if this does not address your question, refer the matter to the competent authorities to obtain, under certain conditions, the removal of that link from the list of results
www.ilsole24ore.com